Leah was recently invited to be a guest on Patty Roberts‘ Aspen Leading Edge podcast. During the discussion, she talked about the intersection of the professional responsibility movement and teaching leadership to law students, and our book, Fundamentals of Lawyer Leadership. Leah focused on the first segment of the book, the leadership of self, where she spends a great deal of time with her students in the leadership class. Through experiential exercises and discussions in class, the students are encouraged to develop their moral compass and who they will be as lawyers. Leah and Patty wrapped up the conversation with the importance of leadership classes in law schools. bit.ly/3YKX8Z4
Thank you for having Leah on the podcast, Dean Roberts!
Recently I was in front of about 150 lawyers who work in a
general counselâs office at one of the Texas public university systems â mostly
Longhorn lawyers within the University of Texas system but a few Aggie lawyers
mixed in. To my surprise and delight, 4 Baylor Lawyers also were in attendance.
The topic was Lawyers
as Leaders. The invitation was the result of an article I wrote for the
Texas Bar Journal and a podcast
interview with Rocky Dhir, CEO
& President, Atlas Legal Research, LP and host of State Bar of Texas Podcasts, who read that
article. Rocky and I were invited by Omar Syed, Associate Vice Chancellor &
Deputy General Counsel for The University of Texas System and chair of the
annual gathering of general counsel lawyers in Austin (who also read the article
and listened to the podcast)
and wanted us to present the conversation at their annual gathering. I was
honored and humbled to have that opportunity to share our work and our passion
for our students and the future of our profession.
In preparation, Rocky and I were encouraged to include
discussions about the role of lawyers as trusted advisor and leaders. We
included such advice as âget to know the departments and schools you advise,â
âask about their work and their goals before trying to solve their legal
issues.â We recommended they try to understand enough about the work of the
âclientsâ so that when they have to tell them no, they can say âYou canât do
that, butâ¦â and then work to find a solution that will meet their goals when
possible. In other words, try to be a problem solver and trusted adviser who
adds value â be more than a legal technician.
As the conversation continued, questions were submitted to
the host electronically â nothing fancy, simply texted to his phone. One of the
questions has stayed with me weeks later, almost haunting me. It went something
like this, âBut what if the general counsel has instructed you to NOT do
anything more than strictly answer the legal question asked?â The question was
not: âWhat if the department does not ask for more than an answer to the legal
question presented?â We had addressed that scenario. Attentive lawyers often
must use that request for legal advice as the springboard for probing to get
the information they need (background, issues, goals, costs, etc.) to help
craft an option or two or three.
As soon as the question was asked, in my lawyerly way, I
began to wonder what else was behind the question. Being part of a university,
I well know how territorial life can be on a campus. Had the young lawyer (at
least I assumed her or him to be) overstepped and been dressed down, i.e. stay
in your lane? Had the general counsel given that instruction in a particular
situation for which that command made sense? Was the office so overwhelmed with
work that such an instruction was necessary for survival? Was the lawyer still
inexperienced, unproven or perhaps not yet trustworthy? I donât know but we were grateful for the
validation we received when a lawyer in the audience (who had a seasoned look
and demeanor) stood and basically summarized all that we had shared about the
need for us, as well as society, to view lawyers as more than âbitâ players
only to be engaged on the periphery. We need lawyers to be valued members of
the team â to be part of the group trying to solve the problem, accomplish the
goal or protecting the university â not merely legal specialists.
We ended our response
with the hope that all the general counsel offices have, or work toward, an
office culture in which lawyers are encouraged to reach beyond the naked legal
question to establish relationships that allow the client (department, school, etc.)
to view their lawyers not as nay-sayers, deal killers or legal assistants, but
as valued and trusted advisors and university partners.
Leadership entails influence and impact in positive ways. We
all need to help our students see themselves as leaders who have an obligation
to serve and who will have many opportunities to help and to make a
difference. To that end, I was
encouraged to see several hands go up when I asked who all in the audience
serves on a non-profit board or volunteers in a service or pro-bono legal
organization. Part of law school must
include a call to arms to all law students, encouraging them to roll up their
sleeves and help their communities, thereby showcasing lawyer leadership at a grassroots
level.
The State Bar of Texas Podcast – available on the Legal Talk Network – recently interviewed Leah Teague, associate dean at Baylor Law, about the importance of enhanced leadership training of future lawyers – and how many law schools are stepping up to the plate and revamping curricula and extra-curricular activities to make this a reality.
Stephen Rispoli
Assistant Dean of Student Affairs and Strategic Initiatives
Director of Innovation and Scholarship, Executive LL.M. in Litigation Management
Baylor Law.
Pat Wilson
Associate Dean and Professor of Law Baylor Law.
Liz Fraley
Professor of Law
Co-Director,
Executive LL.M. in Litigation Management